I read a Telegraph article and it made me shudder, was the article really about a new sequel to an old worn out genre? It harked back to the early 1980s and I had a flashback to Spitting Image and thought of the return of the Chingford Skinhead. I asked myself is there now to be a sequel to a previous Tory nightmare when a Rambo like character had the “First Blood” of this country’s social fabric, or is it a simple remake?
What is it about Chingford that turns out political skinheads, hell bent on kicking the less well off in society? The one thing that age has brought to me is that I think I can actually spot history repeating itself? I now realise It is beginning to dawn on me that history maybe about to repeat itself in that the Tories have been are still fighting a class war cold war left over from the mid 1970s. It is against people not of their own ilk, and fought on behalf of market forces. I say this as the budget is a massive cut in the public sector spending and hopes assures predicts that the private sector will rush forth and fill the gap.
Thatcher first used her denizions to bring about a brutal horror without mercy spawning a new generation; known by some as Thatcher’s Children, or referred to as Thather’s generation. Norman Tebbit referred to in the article and made famous by his get on yer bike speech, (actually his speech to the Tory faithful was nothing like it was portrayed in the press at the time), has passed into mythology. Who knows maybe this one will too?
Lord Tebbit CH PH has that reassuring confidence even when he is giving you bad news you trust him. Delivered in that pilot like way of ”this is your Captain speaking and on this bright sunny morning I need to bring to your attention that the plane is about to crash, but don’t panic” and surprisingly you don’t…. as the crash music plays in the background (you know the reassuring music played to calm you down. I know I was in a plane once that avoided a collision as it was about to land.) Lord Tebbit has the ability to tell you the facts however awful they are; calmly and reassuringly!
The clone of Chingford Iain Duncan Smith is so removed from the reality of everyday people, it appears he comes from the class of people that do not use names, they us their initials IDS. Is he a sort of JR Ewing of politics? This shorthand script belongs to the military and the US. IDS is viewed as a progressive military man, which I suppose is not bad for a former Scots Guards Officer?
Unlike Rambo II when John Rambo returned to free his fellow soldiers held prisoner from a past War! IDS wants to liberate us all by moving us around the country. What I have realised again with age is that I was one of the last “indentured apprentices” being tied to my employer like Pip was to Joe Gargery as a blacksmith in Dickens Great Expectations. Being indentured gave the employer all the rights for the privilege of learning a trade. Not much had changed from Dickens except Joe was not a typical employer.
What I did not realise then, but do now again thanks to age, is that Thatcher started the process of indenturing us all to the state and big business. Water is an example along with other utilities etc We have to work to have the basic utility water. In Switzerland water is considered a basic human right and is free, look here to see how much the water companies change hands for and it demonstrates the point.
Being indentured to the state and loaned out to big business is what IDS is saying we will move people around to get work. That is fine when there is a choice or people are driven by ambition/aspiration to relocate I know having again thanks to age done a lot of that years ago. As someone with a background in housing and public service there is always the law of unintended consequences. I have seen much of this as people have always relocated and being responsible for housing them. When the job does not work out or if they need a support network of a family and friends being miles away usually means that local services have to support that family. Mass dislocation not relocation is what IDS is speaking of.
People will always move because of work, my son works and lives abroad, my daughter in law is from another country, but what I believe IDS is talking of is not about social mobility, but enforced economic mobility of indentured people, so much for free citizens. I may have misjudged IDS time will tell? Maybe I will have to age a bit more before I know. Lord Tebbit is not as bad as his reputation, and as they say sometimes “around here a bad reputation is worth gold”. IDS may appear to some to be a cuddlier Political Skinhead from Chingford, but he for me just as frightening as anything from Rambo first blood. I want to know how IDS can fix broken Britain by disclocating economic relocation? Time will tell!
Here is the article.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/conservative/7856349/Coalition-to-tell-unemployed-to-get-on-your-bike.html